Your reasoning is delusional and irrelevant (and just odd). What does "standing in water" or "depicted in danger" have to do with anything. I fail to see the relevance to any one of your points.
A tit is a tit, an ass is an ass. The character is being exploited in a T and A fashion, more so than the villianized Miller cover because she's naked. How can you justify one form of female exploitation as opposed to another. Wether you are selling it to a general audience or not, is also irrelevant. If I can google it so can others.
You have made it clear that your against female exploitation, yet you have a clearly exploitive piece of art for sale. Do you not see that contradicts your view point and eliminates any credit it may have, not only to me, but to everyone else on this subject?
My statements were never ment to give you a bowel movement. Nor were they ment to scare, crush, or worry you. You can sell as many prints of whatever you like to whomever you like. Good luck with your art, all the power to you.
Thanks for correcting my spelling of "hypocrite", I'll return the favor by posting the definition of it for you:
hypocrite:
1.a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, esp. a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.
2.a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, esp. one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.
For some more enlightenment: http://www.hardcoretruth.com/Hypocrisy/
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: Yeah right....
Date: 2006-04-29 10:36 pm (UTC)A tit is a tit, an ass is an ass. The character is being exploited in a T and A fashion, more so than the villianized Miller cover because she's naked. How can you justify one form of female exploitation as opposed to another. Wether you are selling it to a general audience or not, is also irrelevant. If I can google it so can others.
You have made it clear that your against female exploitation, yet you have a clearly exploitive piece of art for sale. Do you not see that contradicts your view point and eliminates any credit it may have, not only to me, but to everyone else on this subject?
My statements were never ment to give you a bowel movement. Nor were they ment to scare, crush, or worry you. You can sell as many prints of whatever you like to whomever you like. Good luck with your art, all the power to you.
Thanks for correcting my spelling of "hypocrite", I'll return the favor by posting the definition of it for you:
hypocrite:
1.a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, esp. a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.
2.a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, esp. one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.
For some more enlightenment: http://www.hardcoretruth.com/Hypocrisy/
P.S: There's no "a" in pedophile.