I really should know better, but I clicked on a link to the DC message boards, topic of the new Frank Miller cover.
In summary... this is why I’m going to stay way the hell over here okay thanks. However, one exchange did catch my attention and would not let me shake it as it might have a sane person.
maelithil:
Depicting [women] as an ass, a pair of tits, some gorgeous thighs is doing them a disservice. Distilling them into nothing but their sexual attributes is objectifying. And that's exactly what this cover does.
Random Fanboy:
And notice that Superman's chest is OFTEN a whole panel unto itself. Not Superman fighting the bad guy. Not Superman standing full figure. Superman's chest. Just his chest. His huge, massive, S-draped, extraterrestrially muscular chest. Is Superman being objectified? Is he being used? Should I cry for Superman?
And. Just. What? This is the counterexample?
But! Maybe it’s not that his logic is just that scary. Maybe it's hard to understand what she’s talking about because it really, honestly is that there’s no comparable example featuring a male denizen of the DCU. I mean, even the occasional Nightwing crotch shot *tries* to have context.
Obviously, something had to be done. For The Good Of Fandom.
Luckily, much like Miller, I have no shame.
Totally Appropriate Covers (with bonus, never before seen script excerpts!)

Hal’s flying away from us through a generic starfield, nothing interesting to see except him. Have him wriggle around, giving us a good shot of his package. Add some details, something fancy for the fanboys to drool over, but don’t let it draw attention away from the point of the cover – that Kyle has nothing, NOTHING, on my boy Hal.

Be careful with this one – we don’t want Supes to come off as too powerful, too imposing. Maybe have him lean a bit, off balance, the better to show off his *well filled* briefs. He's fiddling with the waist line, such a cock *heh* tease. He knows he’s got what we want, and if we turn the cover, he’ll let us have it.

Well, we’ve done just about every variation on the theme by now, so let’s go back to the basics: Black on black, a full cover shot of Batman’s ass. Add in the utility belt for colour – give it that Sin City look. Show me thick, powerful legs under that latex or whatever the hell he wears. Clenched butt muscles. Make it obvious this is no BatGIRL we’re talking about.
In summary... this is why I’m going to stay way the hell over here okay thanks. However, one exchange did catch my attention and would not let me shake it as it might have a sane person.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Depicting [women] as an ass, a pair of tits, some gorgeous thighs is doing them a disservice. Distilling them into nothing but their sexual attributes is objectifying. And that's exactly what this cover does.
Random Fanboy:
And notice that Superman's chest is OFTEN a whole panel unto itself. Not Superman fighting the bad guy. Not Superman standing full figure. Superman's chest. Just his chest. His huge, massive, S-draped, extraterrestrially muscular chest. Is Superman being objectified? Is he being used? Should I cry for Superman?
And. Just. What? This is the counterexample?
But! Maybe it’s not that his logic is just that scary. Maybe it's hard to understand what she’s talking about because it really, honestly is that there’s no comparable example featuring a male denizen of the DCU. I mean, even the occasional Nightwing crotch shot *tries* to have context.
Obviously, something had to be done. For The Good Of Fandom.
Luckily, much like Miller, I have no shame.
Totally Appropriate Covers (with bonus, never before seen script excerpts!)

Hal’s flying away from us through a generic starfield, nothing interesting to see except him. Have him wriggle around, giving us a good shot of his package. Add some details, something fancy for the fanboys to drool over, but don’t let it draw attention away from the point of the cover – that Kyle has nothing, NOTHING, on my boy Hal.

Be careful with this one – we don’t want Supes to come off as too powerful, too imposing. Maybe have him lean a bit, off balance, the better to show off his *well filled* briefs. He's fiddling with the waist line, such a cock *heh* tease. He knows he’s got what we want, and if we turn the cover, he’ll let us have it.

Well, we’ve done just about every variation on the theme by now, so let’s go back to the basics: Black on black, a full cover shot of Batman’s ass. Add in the utility belt for colour – give it that Sin City look. Show me thick, powerful legs under that latex or whatever the hell he wears. Clenched butt muscles. Make it obvious this is no BatGIRL we’re talking about.
From:
no subject
They seem to have shut up for now, but if they start spouting nonesense again can I link them to the pictures? Because this is EXACTLY WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT GODDAMMIT.
Perfect. This is perfect. And also awesome.
*HEARTS YOU MIGHTILY*
From:
no subject
I mean, you wouldn't want crotch-grabbing Superman to be unfulfilled...
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
I want to comment praising you for the clear message you've transmitted using art, your well-crafted and precise metaphor, or somesuch intelligent comment as you deserve.
But actually? The little green nutsack seam has my brain melting and dripping out my ears.
Wow.
From:
no subject
(And I figure if Miller gets recostuming privileges, then so do I.)
I love that detail.
From:Re: I love that detail.
From:Re: I love that detail.
From:Re: I love that detail.
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
You know, for *justice*.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-05-10 10:19 pm (UTC) - ExpandWhoa!
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-05-18 07:27 pm (UTC) - ExpandFrom:
no subject
::cue ironic use of icon::
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
*g* I'm glad that came across. It would have lost something with *tasteful* images, I think.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:nuts
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-05-12 12:05 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: nuts
From:Re: nuts
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-11-26 05:35 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2007-07-17 06:11 pm (UTC) - ExpandFrom:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-05-13 09:18 am (UTC) - ExpandFrom:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
No, Superman's chest as a cover does not freakin' begin to be analogous to a T&A cover. Superman's chest happens to bear an Icon, one as recognizable, world wide, as a flag. If anyone were asked first impression of a Supes' chest cover, the symbol is all they'd be able to mention at first. It is not objectifying the body.
Grr. Fanboys sometimes tick me off.
And yes, I do own pin up art, but I prefer my comic covers to actually reflect the freakin' essence of the book inside!
From:
no subject
I mean, I'm not arguing against pin up covers or blatant fanservice, really. It's just that the objectification *is* there, and it is *skeevy* when you're not the intended audience.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(I just... I can not get over that script for All Star Batman. Or that they *published it*.)
I agree.
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
You win. The internets is yours!
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Y'know, after those TBS commercials for Lord of the Rngs targeting slash writers (the Frodo is gay for Sam ones), maybe DC will cotton on to alternative markets?
Nah . . . .
From:
no subject
I've never seen those commercials, which surprises me - I would expect they'd have spread all over the internet. When were they aired?
maybe DC will cotton on to alternative markets?
You never know! Perhaps the competition from the yaoi manga will finally drive them to it.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
You rule. Please don't do this too often, it couldn't have been good for your sanity, trying to get inside his head...
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Then I read stuff like this so-called "All Star" Batman and Robin series full of cheesecake ass shots and I think, "Okay...maybe he's just exaggerating masculinity conventions of comics to make some kind of satirical point. Dark Knight Returns is pretty satirical...he can do satire..."
Then I read the All Star issue with Black Canary and see this cover and I think, "Yeah...Miller just likes T'n'A." Subtlety goes out the window. And to do this to Wonder Woman, off all characters. Where the fuck is her arm? It was in the way of a boob, so off it goes?
I bet he’s getting cut a fat paycheque for this stuff. Hope he's enjoying himself.
From:
no subject
and bill sienkiewicz kinda came off that way too in stray toasters (well, also elektra:assassin, but miller wrote that, so i wasn't entirely sure where to assign the blame), which is sad.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-04-21 03:50 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
And now I must go clean my keyboard... ;)
From:
no subject
Or, wait. Hmmm. Can I start the gloating over?
(no subject)
From:From:
no subject
and i would just like to say, HELLS YEAH! i might actually pic up an issue of action comics if it had the promise of such action in it ; )
also, i'm surprised that no one's mentioned this (http://www.comicartcommunity.com/gallery/details.php?image_id=4484&sessionid=d349c9de4bed635440a449cbc9b9870a) recent cover though. i mean, while not quite frank miller, my first thought when i saw it was "WHOA! ASS!" and i briefly thought about buying x-men again (partially due to a fondness for silvestri from days when he sucked less and my taste in comics sucked more).
From:
no subject
I hadn't seen the Black Canary cover either, at least not until after I posted this. I still think the Wonder Woman one is worse, however.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Funny thing
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-05-04 04:17 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Funny thing
From:perhaps
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-05-10 03:43 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: perhaps
From:Re: perhaps
From:Re: perhaps
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-05-11 12:36 pm (UTC) - Expandum?
From:Re: um?
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-05-12 08:36 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: um?
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: